1,596
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

From skeuomorphism to flat design: age-related differences in performance and aesthetic perceptions

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 452-467 | Received 05 Apr 2019, Accepted 16 Aug 2020, Published online: 02 Sep 2020
 

ABSTRACT

The design of graphical user interfaces has been evolving from skeuomorph interfaces – which use elements that mimic the aesthetics and functionality of their real-world counterparts – to minimalist and flat designs. Despite the growing popularity of these new design approaches, they can be challenging for older adults who experience a decline in visual and cognitive abilities. Still, little is known about user performance, aesthetic perception, and preference of older adults, particularly in comparison to younger users and traditional skeuomorph interfaces. In this paper, we examine the performance and aesthetic perception of older (65–77 years old) and younger (20–40) adults with three design approaches: skeuomorph, skeuominimalist, and flat design. Results show flat design is either slower or less accurate than traditional skeuomorph interfaces for older adults across three tasks: visual search, identifying clickable objects, and multiple page navigation. Younger adults were less susceptible to performance differences between design approaches, but still subject to ‘click uncertainty’ with flat interfaces. Skeuominimalism did not show clear performance benefits over flat design or skeuomorphism, while the latter reduced the performance gap between age groups. Finally, younger adults preferred the simplicity of skeuominimalism, while older adults preferred skeuomorph interfaces because of the perceived usability, beauty, and trustiness.

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants of the user study. This work was partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through INESC-ID research unit UIDB/50021/2020, LASIGE research unit UIDB/00408/2020, and project ARCADE PTDC/CCI-COM/30274/2017.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

Additional information

Funding

This work was partially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through INESC-ID research unit UIDB/50021/2020, LASIGE research unit UIDB/00408/2020, and project ARCADE PTDC/CCI-COM/30274/2017.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 333.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.