480
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Offering subsidies to logistics providers and consignors

, , &
Pages 35-60 | Received 16 Aug 2018, Accepted 09 Jul 2019, Published online: 26 Aug 2019
 

Abstract

Firms aim to achieve time-based competitiveness to reach their target market sooner and better to meet consumers’ changing demands and cater to rapidly changing markets. One efficient approach is to speed up logistics performance. To generate positive social externality in social welfare, the government can provide subsidies to faster—but also higher cost—logistics providers and encourage customers to choose these providers. This study examines the influence of government subsidies to railway logistics providers and consignors on market equilibrium. We find that subsidization affects the price, demand, and profits of logistics providers. However, the impact on demand and profits remains the same regardless of whether the subsidy is provided to the railway logistics provider or railway consignor. These results are consistent whether the transportation cost is subject to economics of scale or not. The profit of each logistics provider has a concave relationship with its own transportation time but a convex relationship with its competitor’s transportation time. The key factors that determine the optimal subsidy and its impact on social welfare include the unit operational cost of the railway logistics provider and the logistics provider's time-based differentiation and time values of consignors. In addition, the government provides the highest unit subsidy when the railway logistic provider optimizes its profit at the optimal transportation time. When customer demand is stochastic, we find both the fluctuation level of customers’ demand and the logistics providers’ risk attitude influence the government’s optimal subsidy amount. Providing an optimal subsidy helps to efficiently guide the competitive market and enhance social welfare.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research is supported by NSF of China No: NSFC (71872051, 71472049, 71531005, 71629001, 91746302).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 277.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.