397
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The evaluation of mobile health apps: A psychological perception-based probabilistic linguistic belief thermodynamic multiple attribute decision making method

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 2596-2610 | Received 21 Jan 2020, Accepted 17 Jul 2020, Published online: 18 Aug 2020
 

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a probabilistic linguistic belief thermodynamic multiple attribute decision making method for evaluating mobile health Apps. To extract the evaluation information for mobile health Apps, the quantification transformation of linguistic evaluation of decision makers is critical. However, decision makers may have different perceived values for linguistic terms in their minds. Thus, we deeply investigate the quantification process of linguistic terms based on the psychological perception by introducing prospect theory which can describe the psychological influences of decision makers. Meanwhile, we extend the operational laws of probabilistic linguistic term set (PLTS). In order to efficiently use probabilistic linguistic evaluation information, we further introduce the thermodynamic method to measure the quantity and quality of evaluation information. To process the qualitative rankings for attributes, we propose a non-linear programming model for the determination of attribute weights by improving Borda score which considers the different preferences of decision makers for the rankings. Then, to address the uncertainty situation of probabilistic linguistic evaluation information during the aggregation process, we use the Dempsters’ combination rule of the evidence theory. Considering inconsistent of the ranking results of alternatives based on the exergy indicator and the entropy indicator, we construct a comprehensive score by combining the two indicators. Finally, we apply our proposed method to evaluate existing mobile health Apps and validate it by comparison analysis and sensitivity analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71401026, 71432003,61773352), the Planning Fund for the Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education of China (No. 19YJA630042) and the Double First-class Construction Research Support Project of UESTC (No. SYLYJ2019210).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 277.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.