1,016
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Theory and Methods

Bayesian Inference for Sequential Treatments Under Latent Sequential Ignorability

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1498-1517 | Received 17 Feb 2017, Accepted 12 May 2019, Published online: 21 Aug 2019
 

Abstract

We focus on causal inference for longitudinal treatments, where units are assigned to treatments at multiple time points, aiming to assess the effect of different treatment sequences on an outcome observed at a final point. A common assumption in similar studies is sequential ignorability (SI): treatment assignment at each time point is assumed independent of future potential outcomes given past observed outcomes and covariates. SI is questionable when treatment participation depends on individual choices, and treatment assignment may depend on unobservable quantities associated with future outcomes. We rely on principal stratification to formulate a relaxed version of SI: latent sequential ignorability (LSI) assumes that treatment assignment is conditionally independent on future potential outcomes given past treatments, covariates, and principal stratum membership, a latent variable defined by the joint value of observed and missing intermediate outcomes. We evaluate SI and LSI, using theoretical arguments and simulation studies to investigate the performance of the two assumptions when one holds and inference is conducted under both. Simulations show that when SI does not hold, inference performed under SI leads to misleading conclusions. Conversely, LSI generally leads to correct posterior distributions, irrespective of which assumption holds.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials available online contain further details on MCMC and Data Augmentation algorithms, as well as the true parameters’ values used in the simulation analyses. Furthermore we give results obtained using Marginal Structural models and we investigate sensitivity of the results with respect to prior distribution specification.

Notes

1 Note

We also conducted our Bayesian analyses conditioning on covariates. Results change only slightly; the presence of covariates mainly affects the posterior variability of the causal estimands, introducing noise. Therefore, we preferred to focus on results derived without conditioning on covariates, also in line with our simulation study.

Additional information

Funding

Financial support for this research was provided through the grant “Programma Futuro in Ricerca 2012—RBFR12SHVV_003,” financed by the Italian Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 343.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.