125
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Can Oral Tolerance Explain the Inconsistencies Associated with Total Dietary Diversity and Colon Cancer? A Mechanistic Systematic Review

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2101-2112 | Received 13 Jul 2020, Accepted 31 Aug 2020, Published online: 17 Sep 2020
 

Abstract

Among the gastrointestinal tract cancers, the risk of colon cancer is strongly dependent on dietary factors. For the first time in the current review, all the original case-control studies, associated with the correlation between total dietary diversity score and colon cancer risk, were evaluated. In this regard, three databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Sciences, were investigated to retrieve the related citations from 1990 until 2019. Among the included citations, three studies were finally included. In these included studies, the dietary diversity score was evaluated with 129-item and 800-item FFQs. Findings reveal that total dietary diversity can increase the risk of colon cancer in men, but not women; while, one study using 57-item FFQ reported the beneficial association of total dietary diversity with colon cancer among men. Significant demand for conducting more research to investigate the real mechanistic effects of dietary diversity on the risk of colon cancer development was demonstrated due to the inconsistent, questionable, and incomplete findings associated with the included studies.

Acknowledgments

This study is related to the project NO 1398/10565 from the Student Research Committee, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. We also appreciate the “Student Research Committee” and “Research & Technology Chancellor” at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for their financial support of this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization: MJ, MB. Data curation: MB, AF. Formal analysis: MB, MJ. Investigation: FF. Methodology: FJ, MB. Project administration: HEZ, PMM. Supervision: HEZ, PMM. Validation: FH. Visualization: FH, FJ. Writing (original), draft preparation: MB, MJ, FJ. Writing—review and editing: AMK. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.