148
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Influence of Preoperative Nutritional Status on Patients Who Undergo Upfront Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 2910-2919 | Received 09 Dec 2021, Accepted 08 Feb 2022, Published online: 02 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

Few studies have focused on preoperative nutritional status of esophageal cancer patients eligible for upfront surgery. We aimed to investigate the association of preoperative nutritional status with prognosis of patients who undergo upfront surgery for esophageal cancer. A total of 274 patients who underwent upfront surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between January 2012 and December 2016 were eligible. Preoperative nutritional status was evaluated using prognostic nutritional index (PNI) scoring system, nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002), and controlling nutritional status. The median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 58–70) and 94.7% of patients were male. The pathological stages were Stage I—74.5% (204/274), Stage II—20.4% (56/274), and Stage III—5.1% (14/274). Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced stage, a low PNI, and a high NRS 2002 were independent predictors of overall survival. During median follow-up period of 55 mo, overall survival rates were lower in the high NRS 2002 group (P < 0.001). A high NRS 2002 score was associated with frequent postoperative complications, especially pneumonia and anastomosis site leakage (P = 0.003). The poor preoperative nutritional status with a high NRS 2002 is associated with postoperative complications as well as poor overall survival in patients with upfront surgery for esophageal cancer.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2022.2042573

Author contributions

Jin Hee Noh, Hee Kyong Na, Yong-Hee Kim, Ho June Song, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Kee Don Choi, Gin Hyug Lee, and Hwoon-Yong Jung contributed to the design of the research. Jin Hee Noh, Hee Kyong Na, Yong-Hee Kim, and Ho June Song contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the data. Jin Hee Noh, Hee Kyong Na, and Yong-Hee Kim contributed to the interpretation of the data. Jin Hee Noh and Hee Kyong Na drafted the manuscript. Jin Hee Noh, Hee Kyong Na, Yong-Hee Kim, Ho June Song, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Kee Don Choi, Gin Hyug Lee, and Hwoon-Yong Jung critically revised the manuscript, and agree to be fully accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the work, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.