Long-acting opioid prescribing patterns of ophthalmic plastic surgeons in the medicare Part D database

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To assess extended release/long acting (ER/LA) opioid prescribing patterns among ophthalmic plastic surgeons in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Part D database.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on oculoplastic surgeons in the CMS Part D database who prescribed ER/LA opioids from 2013 to 2017. American Society of Ophthalmic Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) and non-ASOPRS surgeons were analyzed as groups. Prescribers were also analyzed based on gender and practice experience.

Results

Oculoplastic surgeons (64 ASOPRS and 78 non-ASOPRS) were responsible for 1,177 ER/LA opioid prescriptions from 2013 to 2017. ASOPRS members accounted for 4.6% and non-ASOPRS members accounted for 7.5% of all ER/LA opioids prescribed by ophthalmologists over the study period (p= .02). The total number of ASOPRS and non-ASOPRS members prescribing ER/LA opioids decreased by 52% (p= .10) and 58% (p= .07) from 2013 to 2017 respectively.

Conclusion

ER/LA opioids are indicated for treatment of chronic pain and may be appropriately prescribed by the oculoplastic surgeon in certain circumstances, however due to the higher risk of overdose injury, those circumstances must be defined and justified. While a relatively small number of oculoplastic surgeons (10.6% ASOPRS and 19.6% non-ASOPRS) prescribed ER/LA opioids from 2013 to 2017, non-ASOPRS oculoplastic surgeons wrote 23.5% more ER/LA opioid prescriptions over the study period. Over the 5-year study period there was a general decline in the prescribing of ER/LA opioids by oculoplastic surgeons. Reviewing the prescribing practices of oculoplastic specialists, regardless of professional affiliation, is necessary to understand the role of ER/LA opioids for all of ophthalmology.

KEYWORDS:

• Extended release/long-acting opioid
• oculoplastic surgeon
• pain management
• prescription

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).