166
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Contrasting response of wheat to one-time root zone fertilization of ordinary and polymer coated urea for grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1722-1733 | Received 20 Jul 2020, Accepted 03 Dec 2021, Published online: 13 Dec 2021
 

Abstract

Appropriate fertilization methods and high efficiency of N fertilizers are crucial to achieve high yields and curtail N losses. This study documented the comparative effectiveness of one-time root zone fertilization (ORZF) and polymer coated urea (PCU) as alternate ways to enhance grain yield and reduce potential N losses in wheat. The study was planned using two N fertilization methods [split-surface broadcasting (SSB) and ORZF], two N sources [ordinary urea (OU) and PCU] along with a control treatment following a completely randomized design. The SSB proved more efficient by showing 9% higher grain yield than ORZF, irrespective of N sources. The PCU resulted in 8% and 10% more grain yield than OU when applied through SSB and ORZF method, respectively. Likewise, maximum total N uptake was achieved with PCU than OU with an increment of 15% (SSB) and 7% (ORZF). The NUE indices remained statistically similar between methods, however, SSB showed higher values than ORZF. On the other hand, N sources had a pronounced effect on these indices which improved considerably with the PCU than OU under both methods. Maximum N losses were quantified with the OU in both methods (56% in SSB, and 54% in ORZF). Conversely, these losses were significantly reduced to 42% in SSB and to 48% in ORZF with the addition of PCU. The findings suggested that the application of PCU can be an effective way to improve wheat productivity and reduce N losses but ORZF is not a suitable alternative to SSB for wheat crops.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Mahboob Ali Sial, Deputy Chief Scientist/Head Plant Breeding and Genetics Division, Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tandojam, for providing plant material to conduct this study.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 495.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.