ABSTRACT
The paper discusses the main issues which emerge for the university as an institution in the European context from the development of the lifelong learning paradigm. It focuses on both the opportunity-creating and tension-provoking presence of the lifelong learning concept in the university’s institutional environment. The analysis is based on a thematic review of articles published in the International Journal of Lifelong Education (IJLE) during the four decades of its existence. The paper argues that: (1) the implementation of lifelong learning requires a profound change in the systemic characteristics of the university institution and cannot be limited to the establishment of departments of adult and continuing education; (2) without being uncritically perceived, lifelong learning is a strategy that can help universities successfully address some of their main problems and continue to develop as a key institution of societies in the 21st century and (3) in the European context, the institutional model that can embody the paradigm for lifelong learning and at the same time contains the possibility of preserving the specificity of university as an institution, is best symbolised by a cathedral.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Pepka Boyadjieva
Pepka Boyadjieva is Professor at the Institute of Philosophy and Sociology at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Honorary Professor of the Sociology of Education at the University of Nottingham, UK. Her research focuses on higher education, university development, educational inequalities, lifelong learning, and university/ school to work transitions.
Kevin Orr
Kevin Orr is Professor of Work and Learning at the University of Huddersfield, UK. His research interests include vocational education and training and non-university higher education.