Comparison of Surgically Excised Premacular Membranes in Eyes with Macular Pucker and Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To describe and compare characteristics of premacular membranes in idiopathic macular pucker (iMP) and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) using immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopy.

Materials and methods: For immunocytochemical and ultrastructural analyses, premacular membranes were harvested during vitrectomy from 16 eyes with iMP and 12 eyes with PVR. All specimens were processed as flat mounts for phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy. We used 19 different primary antibodies such as anti-α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), anti-integrin-αv, anti-galectin, anti-IBA-1, anti-EMMPRIN (CD147), anti-ricinus (RCS) and anti-collagen-type I. Eight of 28 eyes were also prepared for transmission electron microscopy.

Results: In all eyes with iMP and PVR, positive immunoreactivity of integrins, especially αvβ3 was found. There was also a strong staining of anti-α-SMA, anti-galectin, anti-EMMPRIN, anti-RCS, anti-IBA1 and anti-collagen-type I. Transmission electron microscopy showed that premacular membrane of iMP composed of myofibroblasts, glial cells and fibroblasts. In eyes with PVR, retinal pigment epithelial cells and myofibroblasts were seen as predominant cell types.

Conclusion: Premacular membranes of iMP and PVR presented with similarities in cell distribution and immunoreactivity, but showed differences in cell composition. Herein, we demonstrate immunocytochemical characteristics involved in fibrotic processes. Cell transdifferentiation into myofibroblasts represents an important process in pathogenesis of both entities. In order to address future anti-fibrotic treatment strategies, we emphasize that both fibrotic diseases share distinct immunocytochemical and ultrastructural features.

KEYWORDS:

• Epiretinal membrane
• macular pucker
• proliferative vitreoretinopathy
• immunocytochemistry
• transmission electron microscopy

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Renate Scheler, Department of Ophthalmology, Vitreoretinal and Pathology Unit, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, for assistance in specimen preparation and for her critical comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

There is no source of funding for this research.