186
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Choroid

Comparison of Choroidal Vascularity Index in Patients with Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma, Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome, and Healthy Controls

, , &
Pages 154-160 | Received 16 Feb 2021, Accepted 25 Jul 2021, Published online: 15 Aug 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To compare peripapillary choroidal vascularity index (CVI) parameters in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEG), pseudoexfoliation (PEX) syndrome, and healthy controls.

Methods

A total of 240 eyes of 240 patients were included in this cross-sectional prospective study, and the three groups consisted of (i) 80 eyes of 80 patients with PEG, (ii) 80 eyes of 80 patients with PEX syndrome, and (iii) 80 healthy control eyes. Peripapillary enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography images were binarized via standard protocols with the ImageJ software. CVI was analyzed in all sectors of the peripapillary region.

Results

Peripapillary CVI was found to be significantly lower in the PEG group (61.6 ± 2.32) compared with the PEX group (64.7 ± 3.15) and the control group (67.5 ± 2.44) (p < .001), and patients with PEX also had significantly lower values compared to controls (p < .001). Peripapillary CVI values were significantly lower in the temporal, nasal, superotemporal, superonasal, inferotemporal and inferonasal sectors of the PEG group compared to both the PEX group and controls (p < .001). Peripapillary CVI was also found to be lower in all sectors in the PEX group compared to controls (p < .001). Global peripapillary choroidal thickness was significantly thinner in the PEG group than the PEX and control groups (133.37 ± 39.16, 154.36 ± 33.28 and 157.82 ± 36.77 μm, respectively, p < .001).

Conclusions

In the current study, it was shown that the presence of PEX caused a decrease in CVI value and this decrease was highest in patients with PEG. CVI may be a useful parameter to show vascular dysfunction in PEG and PEX syndrome.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 555.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.