328
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Genetic Determinants

NAT1 genetic variation increases asthma risk in children with secondhand smoke exposure

, MD, , PhD, , PhD, , MS, , PhD, , MD, MS, , MD, MS, , PhD, , MD, PhD & , PhD show all
Pages 284-292 | Received 18 Jul 2019, Accepted 14 Nov 2019, Published online: 06 Dec 2019
 

Abstract

Objective

We previously reported that children exposed to secondhand smoke (SHS) that carried variants in the NAT1 gene had over two-fold higher hair cotinine levels. Our objective was to determine if NAT1 polymorphisms confer increased risk for developing asthma in children exposed to SHS.

Methods

White participants in the Cincinnati Childhood Allergy and Air Pollution Study (n = 359) were genotyped for 10 NAT1 variants. Smoke exposure was defined by hair cotinine and parental report. Asthma was objectively assessed by spirometry and methacholine challenge. Findings were replicated in the Genomic Control Cohort (n = 638).

Results

Significant associations between 5 NAT1 variants and asthma were observed in the CCAAPS exposed group compared to none in the unexposed group. There was a significant interaction between NAT1 rs13253389 and rs4921581 with smoke exposure (p = 0.02, p = 0.01) and hair cotinine level (p = 0.048, p = 0.042). Children wildtype for rs4921581 had increasing asthma risk with increasing hair cotinine level, whereas those carrying the NAT1 minor allele had an increased risk of asthma regardless of cotinine level. In the GCC, 13 NAT1 variants were associated with asthma in the smoke-exposed group, compared to 0 in the unexposed group, demonstrating gene-level replication.

Conclusions

Variation in the NAT1 gene modifies asthma risk in children exposed to secondhand-smoke. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a gene-environment interaction between NAT1 variants, smoke exposure, cotinine levels, and pediatric asthma. NAT1 genotype may have clinical utility as a biomarker of increased asthma risk in children exposed to smoke.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the clinic staff for their efforts in study coordination, recruitment, data management, and data collection. We also thank all of the CCAAPS and GCC participants and families for their time and commitment. We also thank Angela Sadler for editorial assistance.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.