271
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Inpatient albuterol spacing as an indicator of discharge readiness

, MDORCID Icon, , MD & , MD
Pages 57-62 | Received 06 Jul 2021, Accepted 30 Dec 2021, Published online: 12 Jan 2022
 

Abstract

Introduction

In children admitted for asthma exacerbation, multiple evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines exist to identify readiness for discharge. At many institutions, weaning of albuterol is part of the discharge process, though presently there is limited evidence to guide best practice. We sought to determine how many children required escalation of care once placed on every 4-h dosing of albuterol.

Methods

We performed a consecutive case series of pediatric patients between 5 and 18 years of age admitted to a single tertiary care center’s pediatric hospitalist service between April 2015 and April 2018 with a discharge diagnosis of asthma. Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (PICU) or a subspecialty service were excluded, as has been done previously. Time between albuterol administrations was tracked. “Treatment escalation” was defined as when a patient required more frequent albuterol more dosing after previously tolerating albuterol doses separated by more than 3.5 h.

Results

A total of 331 patients met inclusion criteria; 136 were female (41.1%), and the average age was 8.8 years. Twenty-six of the 331 patients (7.8%) required escalation of albuterol therapy. Eleven patients returned to the emergency department (ED) following discharge, 2 of which had experienced treatment escalation while admitted.

Conclusions

Our case series showed that most patients were safe to discharge after spacing albuterol treatments to 4 h, with few returns to the ED and readmissions. Albuterol spacing to every 4 h once appears to be a reasonable discharge criterion, but future studies are needed to determine if this is a safe and efficient.

Author contributions

Dr. Shen conceptualized and designed the study, designed the data collection instruments, collected data, carried out the initial analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. Aoyama conceptualized and designed the study, designed the data collection instruments, collected data, carried out the initial analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. Lee conceptualized and designed the study and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.