282
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The usefulness of YouTube videos as a source of information in asthma

, BSc, , BSc, , MD, , MD, PhD, DMSciORCID Icon, , MD, PhDORCID Icon, , BSc & , MD, PhDORCID Icon show all
Pages 737-743 | Received 13 Mar 2022, Accepted 18 Jun 2022, Published online: 15 Jul 2022
 

Abstract

Background

Patient education is a key element in the management of asthma.

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the popularity and usefulness of YouTube videos on asthma.

Methods

Two authors screened and evaluated the 200 most popular videos. Data on likes, dislikes, views, comment, source of uploader, days since upload, and usefulness were recorded and included for analyses. The usefulness of the videos was categorized as follows: useful, misleading, or neutral. Misleading videos provided at least one scientifically incorrect detail, whereas useful videos contained scientifically correct information.

Results

A total of 130 videos were included, and the total number of views was 100,290,242 with a total duration of 29 h and 8 min. While 26.6% of videos were uploaded by TV shows and YouTube channels, only 7.7% were uploaded by lung specialists. 65.4% of the videos contained scientifically correct information, whereas 18.5% contained misleading information. Although videos from medical professionals had a higher quality than videos from YouTube channels and TV shows, the latter were more popular. Misleading videos had numerically, but not statistically significant higher views compared with useful videos.

Conclusions

YouTube videos on asthma are popular in terms of viewer interaction, and the popularity is not restricted to videos uploaded by professional sources. Although more than half of the videos were found to be useful, a non-negligible proportion of videos were assessed as misleading. The usefulness of YouTube videos on asthma is variable and initiatives should be taken to increase the potential of YouTube as an useful source in patient education.

Declaration of interest

Howraman Meteran has received honoraria for lectures and advisory board from GSK, Teva, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Airsonett AB, and ALK-Abelló within the past five years.

The other authors have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.