144
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Screening for asthma in preschool children with sickle cell disease

, MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , DO & , MD show all
Pages 1787-1792 | Received 06 Feb 2023, Accepted 01 Mar 2023, Published online: 21 Mar 2023
 

Abstract

Background

Asthma in preschool children is poorly defined, proving to be a challenge for early detection. The Breathmobile Case Identification Survey (BCIS) has been shown to be a feasible screening tool in older SCD children and could be effective in younger children. We attempted to validate the BCIS as an asthma screening tool in preschool children with SCD.

Methods

This is a prospective, single-center study of 50 children aged 2–5 years with SCD. BCIS was administered to all patients and a pulmonologist blinded to the results evaluated patients for asthma. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were obtained to assess risk factors for asthma and acute chest syndrome in this population.

Results

Asthma prevalence (n = 3/50; 6%) was lower than atopic dermatitis (20%) and allergic rhinitis (32%). Sensitivity (100%), specificity (85%), positive predictive value (30%), and negative predictive value (100%) of the BCIS were high. Clinical demographics, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma, viral respiratory infection, hematology parameters, sickle hemoglobin subtype, tobacco smoke exposure, and hydroxyurea were not different between patients with or without history of ACS, although eosinophil was significantly lower in the ACS group (p = 0.0093). All those with asthma had ACS, known viral respiratory infection resulting in hospitalization (3 RSV and 1 influenza), and HbSS (homozygous Hemoglobin SS) subtype.

Conclusion

The BCIS is an effective asthma screening tool in preschool children with SCD. Asthma prevalence in young children with SCD is low. Previously known ACS risk factors were not seen, possibly from the beneficial effects of early life initiation of hydroxyurea.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.