105
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Breathing pattern disorder in chronic rhinosinusitis with severe asthma: nasal obstruction and polyps do not increase prevalence

, BSc, , BSc, MSc, , MBBS, MRCPORCID Icon, , RN, BSc, , PhD, , MS, FRCSORCID Icon, , MBChB, FRCSORCID Icon, , MD, FRCP & , PhD, FRCPORCID Icon show all
Pages 177-183 | Received 23 Mar 2023, Accepted 30 Aug 2023, Published online: 14 Sep 2023
 

Abstract

Objectives

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with severe asthma are associated with breathing pattern disorder (BPD). Mouth breathing is a sign of breathing pattern disorder, and nose breathing a fundamental part of breathing pattern retraining for BPD. The prevalence of BPD in relation to CRS subtypes and the relationship of nasal obstruction to BPD in CRS and associated severe asthma is unknown. The breathing pattern assessment tool (BPAT) can identify BPD. Our objective was to thus investigate the prevalence of BPD, nasal airflow obstruction and measures of airway disease severity in CRS with (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) in severe asthma.

Methods

We determined whether CRS status, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) or polyp disease increased BPD prevalence. Demographic factors, measures of airway function and breathlessness in relation to BPD status and CRS subtypes were also evaluated.

Results

130 Patients were evaluated (n = 69 had BPD). The prevalence of BPD in CRS with severe asthma was 53.1%. There was no difference between BPD occurrence between CRSwNP and CRSsNP. The mean polyp grade and PNIF were not statistically different between the BPD and non-BPD group. The presence of nasal polyps did not increase breathlessness.

Conclusions

BPD and CRS are commonly co-associated. CRS status and nasal obstruction per se does not increase BPD prevalence.

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr John Salter, Consultant Statistician, for undertaking data analysis, and Mrs Lizzie Grillo, Clinical Specialist Respiratory Physiotherapist, Royal Brompton Hospital London, for constructive review of the manuscript.

Author contributions

RL and HHK conceptualized the study and supervised data collection. All authors were involved with data set collection, interpretation and writing of the manuscript.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Data availability statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.