243
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Biological resistance of sandwich particleboard made with sugarcane, thermally-treated Pinus wood and malva fiber

, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 171-180 | Published online: 02 Apr 2022
 

Abstract

Particleboards produced with other lignocellulosic materials, beyond wood, are promising products for the furniture and building construction components, as doors, lining, floor, partitions, and coverings. However, there is little information about the resistance of them to xylophagous organisms. This is important due the different uses of particleboards, where they will be subject to attacks by decaying organisms, which can affect a structure and put people at risk. The present study aims to determine the biological resistance of particleboard produced with pine, sugarcane bagasse and malva particles to xylophagous organisms. The particleboard was produced with different proportions of pine wood heat treated at 200 °C and malva fiber (outer layers) and sugarcane bagasse core glued with an adhesive based on polyurethane from castor oil. No-choice and choice feeding tests with dry wood (Cryptotermes brevis) and conehead (Nasutitermes corniger) termites were carried out for the resistance test to xylophagous organisms, in addition to a test with rotting fungi which cause brown (Gloeophyllum trabeum and Rhodonia placenta) and white rot (Irpex lacteus and Trametes versicolor). The trial with dry wood termites showed low mass losses, regardless of the proportions applied. The mass losses were accentuated for the test with conehead termite, having the particleboard composed of 100% pine been the most resistant among the boards tested. The greatest mass losses for fungal resistance were caused by Gloeophyllum trabeum. The particleboard produced with 100% pine (outer layer) showed the highest resistance to the tested xylophagous organisms.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), funding code 001, the Espírito Santo Research and Innovation Foundation (FAPES) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Author contributions

The article was written through the contributions of all authors and all of them have approved the final version of the article. M.R.S., P.G.A.S., and F.R.L. developed the particleboards and analyzed the preliminary results. F.D.M., J.R.M., Y.M.L, and J.B.P. proposed experimental solutions, validated the initial objectives of the project, and wrote the original draft. J.B.P. and A.H.C.R. helped for reviewing, editing, and correcting both spelling and grammar errors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 919.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.