819
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Mechanisms of soot-aggregate restructuring and compaction

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 89-111 | Received 10 May 2022, Accepted 26 Sep 2022, Published online: 14 Nov 2022
 

Abstract

Soot aggregates form as open, fractal-like structures, but aged atmospheric particles are often observed to be restructured into more-compact shapes due to internal mixing (“coating”). This compaction has a major effect on the radiative properties of the aggregates, and may also influence their aerosol-cloud interactions, toxicity, and deposition in human lungs. Recent laboratory studies have presented conflicting arguments on whether this compaction occurs during condensation or during the evaporation of coatings. In this three-part study, we combine theory and experiments to explain these conflicting results. First, we review the surface-science literature and identify explicit mechanisms for condensation-compaction as well as evaporation-compaction. We also identify a mechanism for avoiding compaction during condensation, based on heterogeneous nucleation theory and the kinetic barriers to capillary formation. Second, we review the soot-restructuring literature and find clear evidence for both condensation- and evaporation-compaction, with condensation-compaction being the norm. Third, we present new experimental results where the capillary forces due to anthracene coatings were “switched on” or “switched off” by using solid or liquid phases during coating addition and removal. Consequently, we demonstrate condensation-compaction, evaporation-compaction, and no compaction, for the same soot source. Overall, our study indicates that soot particles will typically undergo compaction when internal mixing occurs by the condensation of liquid coatings, while compaction may be avoided when internal mixing occurs through coagulation or the gas-to-particle formation of solid or highly viscous coatings.

Copyright © 2022 American Association for Aerosol Research

Author contributions

JCC conceived the study, initiated the experiments and critical reviews, and drafted the paper. RLM and MGB discussed initial results, co-designed subsequent experiments, and contributed substantially to data interpretation and to writing.

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the ERC under grant ERC-CoG-615922-BLACARAT. Thanks are owed to Maarten Heringa for providing a component of the condensation apparatus, to Elisabeth Müller for TEM assistance, and to Louis Tiefenauer for the loan of the TEM sampler. We are grateful to Jay Slowik and Alexei Khalizov for their openness in sharing published data, to Ogochuwku Y. Enekwizu for stimulating discussions, to Timothy Sipkens for contributions to figures, and to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 165.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.