247
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measurement of 100 nm monodisperse particles by four Accurate methods: Traceability and uncertainty

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 323-333 | Received 09 Oct 2023, Accepted 08 Jan 2024, Published online: 12 Feb 2024
 

Abstract

Accurate measurements of particle diameter are necessary for quantitative characterization of key aerosol properties including the Cunningham slip correction factor, charging probability, diffusion coefficient, coagulation coefficient, and optical properties. In this study, we use four techniques to measure the diameter of nominal 100 nm reference spheres having a distributional standard deviation of less than 2 nm. The instruments used are a differential mobility analyzer (DMA), atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and an electrical-gravitational aerosol balance (EAB). All four measurements are traceable to SI units at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) or at National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST). This study includes quantitative estimates of the measurement uncertainty for each technique. It finds that the measured average particle diameter is within 3% for all the methods, with at least some overlap in all the estimated uncertainties using a 95% confidence interval. Nevertheless, the difference between the EAB results and the other methods may become significant as they are separately intended to be used in the manner described here for the traceable certification of future nanoscale particle size standards. Possible reasons for the differences are incorrect or inadequate accounting for surface residue for aerosol measurements, adhesion-force distortion for the AFM measurements, e-beam shrinkage for the SEM measurements, slip correction uncertainty for the DMA, and work function variability of the electrodes for the EAB.

EDITOR:

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge Kavuri P. Purushotham (NIST) for performing SEM imaging.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

KJD was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Measurement Science Division [Award No. 70NANB17H057].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 165.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.