384
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Effects of different oxygen concentrations on the proliferation, survival, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 240-253 | Received 04 Mar 2018, Accepted 04 Jun 2018, Published online: 18 Apr 2019
 

ABSTRACT

In physiological and pathological environments, the concentration of oxygen around osteoblasts varies widely. No studies have systematically evaluated the effects of different oxygen concentrations on the proliferation, survival, migration, and osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts. In this study, we cultured the osteoblast precursor cell line MC3T3-E1 in small individual chambers with oxygen concentrations of 1%, 3%, 6%, 9%, and 21%. Cell proliferation was evaluated by the proliferation index test and EdU staining. To test cell survival, a live/dead assay was performed. A tablet scratch assay was performed to detect the migratory ability of the cells. Bone nodule formation experiments and immunofluorescence and Western blotting analyses of osteogenic-related proteins were performed to assess the osteogenic differentiation of the cells. We found that the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation ability of MC3T3-E1 cells in different oxygen concentrations were both approximately bell-shaped curves and that the optimal oxygen concentrations were approximately 6% and 9%, respectively. The live/dead assay showed that the survival of MC3T3-E1 cells in different oxygen concentrations was affected by the amount of serum. The tablet scratch experiment showed that there was greater cell migration with oxygen concentrations of 1%, 3%, and 21% than with oxygen concentrations of 6% and 9%. Our results have significant reference value for the intervention of the pathological processes involving osteoblasts, such as fracture, osteoporosis, and some vascular diseases. These results also have an important guiding role for the new scientific idea that osteoblasts can function as treatment cells to repair bone defects.

Author contributions statement

Liu Haixin, Yang Minsheng, and Wu Guofeng performed all assays. Zhu Lixin, Guo Jiasong, Yang Lianjun, and Cao Yanlin were involved in planning and supervised the work. Liu Haixin and Yang Minsheng processed the experimental data, performed the analysis, and drafted the manuscript. Liu Haixin, Liu Chun, and Tan Zhiwen designed the figures. Jin Yanglei aided in recording the results and worked on the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. Liu Haixin, Yang Minsheng, and Wu Guofeng contributed equally to this work. In addition, all authors have read and approved this final submitted manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China for its financial support and the Heart Center Laboratory of Zhujiang Hospital for supplying experimental space, equipment, and technical guidance.

Declaration of interests

There are no perceived or potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, to be disclosed.

Additional information

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 81672140).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,908.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.