![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are major energy consumers and cause environmental impact on receiving waters. Many WWTPs are operated in a less-than- optimal manner with respect to both treatment and energy efficiency. A better solution is to optimize the operation and processes of the existing WWTPs. Therefore, the most effective process parameter for providing control strategies was determined. The South WWTP of Tehran was designed and simulated based on the activated sludge model using MATLAB/ Simulink software for the first time in the country to obtain the factors affecting WWTP. To calibrate this model some kinetic and stoichiometric coefficients were determined. Then the simulator validation was performed by three error calculation methods. Finally, the values of three main controllers, including the optimum rate or return activated sludge (RAS), internal recycle (IR) and oxygen transfer coefficient (KLa) are determined using the Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm. According to the results, coefficients such as Y, kd, K and KS for Oxidation-Ditch process were in the range of 0.303-0.331mgVSS /mg sCOD, 0.030-0.033 1/day, 1.65-1.93 1/day and 37.6-44.92 mg sCOD/l, respectively and the Mean of COD, BOD5, TSS and TN removal was obtained 94.8 ± 0.4, 97.3 ± 0.65, 94.7 ± 1.5 and 56 ± 7.46, respectively. Also, the percentage of Root Mean Square for TN, TSS, COD, BOD5 was 3.14%, 2.95%, 3.13% and 5.2%, respectively, Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.88, 0.93, 0.89, 0.99 and absolute mean error of 2.62%, 2.47%, 2.6% and 3.58%, respectively, which shows that the simulation outputs are compatible with the effluent of plant. To achieve the best process performance conditions, RAS and IR must be considered for 1.7 and 0.8 percent of influent wastewater and KLa is suggested to be 154 d-1. Therefore, by using the optimization performed, the effect of other controllers on the process can be investigated and selected.
Nomenclature
| Feed flow rate | = | Qf (m3/d) |
| Return activated sludge flow rate | = | Qr (m3/d) |
| Return activated sludge flow ratio | = | RAS (Qr/Qf) |
| Internal recycle flow rate | = | Qa (m3/d) |
| Internal recycle flow ratio | = | IR (Qa/Qf) |
| Dissolved Oxygen concentration (DO) | = | SO (mg/l) |
| Removal efficiency | = | R (%) |
| Initial substrate concentration | = | Si (mg/l) |
| Final substrate concentration | = | Se (mg/l) |
| Volume reactor | = | V (m3) |
| Specific substrate utilization rate | = | U (mg COD/mg. d) |
| Mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) | = | X (mg/l) |
| Sludge residence time (SRT) | = | ƟH(d) |
| Maximum growth yield coefficient | = | Y (g/g) |
| Decay rate constant | = | Kd (d-1) |
| Maximum specific rate constant | = | K (d-1) |
| Saturation constant | = | KS (mg/l) |
| maximum specific growth rate | = | µm (time−1) |
| Active sludge model number one | = | ASM1 |
| 5-day biological oxygen demand | = | BOD5 (mg/l) |
| Chemical oxygen demand | = | COD (mg/l) |
| Total suspended solids | = | TSS (mg/l) |
| Total nitrogen | = | TN (mg/l) |
Acknowledgements
Hereby, we sincerely appreciate Materials and Energy Research Center in Karaj, and Tehran Sewage Company for their cooperation and participation in the performance of the project.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.