294
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Obstetrician-gynecologist and patient factors associated with intimate partner violence screening in a clinical setting

, Ph.D., , Ph.D., , Ph.D., R.N, , Ph.D., NCC, LMHC & , Ph.D.
Pages 1000-1013 | Received 31 Jul 2019, Accepted 15 Jun 2020, Published online: 02 Jul 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Screening for intimate partner violence is recommended by the medical community. This study investigated obstetrician-gynecologists’ intimate partner violence screening patterns and physician and patient factors associated with screening. Four hundred obstetricians-gynecologists completed the Physician Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey between December 2014 and July 2015. Their patients completed the Patient Safety and Satisfaction Survey. Hierarchical generalized linear modeling analyzed physician and patient variables related to the likelihood of being screened. Forty-four physicians responded. The viable patient response rate was 81.3 percent (n = 894) of patients from included physicians. Less than half (43.2 percent) of physicians reported screening during annual exams. There was a statistically significant difference for patient race/ethnicity (p < .03) and the number of previous doctor visits (p < .03) with not being screened. These patient-level variables accounted for approximately 68.3 percent of the variance screening odds. There was no significant difference (p < .10) between physicians’ perceived preparation, knowledge, and attitudes for not being screened. The hierarchical generalized linear modeling analysis showed a trend for physicians with a high-perceived preparation for screening was related to initial visits. This study identified that obstetrician-gynecologists do not routinely screen for IPV and race/ethnicity and number of visits are factors in screening for intimate partner violence.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Financial support for this study was provided in part by Grant UA6MC19010 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Title V, Social Security Act, Health Resources and Services Administration, and Department of Health and Human Services).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 444.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.