![Sample our Communication Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5927/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Information-Science2.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Aging in place (AIP), or older adults' ability to remain in their homes and communities as they age, is an important social issue given the growing aging population. Communication is a central component of this process, yet little is known about how communicative resources are used by residents to co-construct community as they age. In order to address this topic, a quasi-ethnographic study of a local neighborhood was completed using communication infrastructure theory (CIT). Three themes emerged from the data: (1) shifting communication infrastructure, (2) shifting identities, and (3) shifting priorities of the community and its members. These findings inform theoretical and practical implications related to the built environment and organizational-resident communication that facilitates the AIP experience.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the editor and the reviewers for their helpful comments and guidance.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes on contributor
Lindsey B. Anderson (Ph.D., Purdue University) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Maryland, College Park. Dr Anderson's research examines the intersections of communication and age in the workplace. Specific areas of interest include intergenerational interactions at work, organizational portrayals of age/aging, and retirement.
Notes
1 All names and places in this paper are pseudonyms.
2 The term “aging in community” has been suggested as an alternative to “aging in place” since it better situates the process within a larger context. However, aging in place is still the dominant label.