200
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of the efficiency of different chitosan composites in immobilisation of chromium in contaminated soils

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1501-1514 | Received 31 May 2020, Accepted 24 Mar 2021, Published online: 09 Apr 2021
 

ABSTRACT

To investigate the effect of different chitosan composites on the immobilisation of chromium in soil, a pot factorial experiment was conducted in greenhouse conditions using a completely randomised design with three replications. Factors studied were soil chromium levels (0, 20, 60, and 180 mg kg−1) and types of adsorbent applied to the soil, including pure chitosan, biochar, zeolite, manganese dioxide and composites of chitosan-biochar, chitosan-zeolite, chitosan-manganese dioxide and control. The application of different adsorbents to soil decreased the concentrations of DTPA and MgCl2 extractable chromium and chitosan composites, especially chitosan-manganese dioxide, were more effective for the immobilisation of chromium in the soil than the pure adsorbents. Reductions in DTPA-extractable chromium by pure biochar, zeolite, manganese dioxide, and chitosan were 34.9%, 29.4%, 19.8%, and 15.1% and by composites of chitosan-manganese dioxide, chitosan-biochar and chitosan-zeolite were 54.8%, 46.8%, and 39.7% respectively when compared to the control treatment. The use of different adsorbents significantly reduced the labile forms and thus the mobility of chromium in the soil and the composite adsorbents were more effective than the pure adsorbents. It is concluded that coating different adsorbents with chitosan increases their efficiency in immobilising chromium in soil.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank professor Ravi Naidu, Global Innovation Chair and Director, Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, The University of Newcastle, Australia for reviewing of the manuscript and giving valuable comments.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.