307
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Avian forebrain processing of magnetic intensity and inclination: hippocampus, anterior forebrain Wulst and an unexpected double-dissociation

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 230-247 | Received 14 Oct 2020, Accepted 21 Dec 2020, Published online: 16 Feb 2021
 

Abstract

It is often neglected that the ability of birds to extract navigational information from the earth’s magnetic field can be shaped by learning and memory, which would necessarily recruit brain regions of the telencephalon that support cognitive processes. In the current study, we exploited a validated, conditioning experimental paradigm to explore the possible role of the homing pigeon hippocampal formation (HF) and anterior forebrain Wulst in the detection of variation in both magnetic field intensity and inclination. Whereas HF lesions resulted in a complete loss of intensity discrimination while sparing inclination discrimination, Wulst lesions had the opposite effect, resulting in a complete loss of inclination discrimination while sparing intensity discrimination. It is not surprising that Wulst lesions should disrupt inclination discrimination because in migratory songbirds, regions of the Wulst are known to support the geomagnetic compass, which relies on inclination. More challenging is explaining why HF should be sensitive to variation in magnetic intensity. We suggest that the observed HF sensitivity to intensity may reflect incorporation of geomagnetic irregularities (anomalies) as pigeons learn a map-like representation of familiar landmarks and landscape features. The parallel processing of magnetic intensity and inclination in the homing pigeon forebrain sets the foundation for future studies designed to better understand how cognitive processing can influence geomagnetically guided navigational behavior in birds.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are sincerely grateful to Andy Wickiser for the construction and maintenance of the experimental setup. Ryan M. Peterson graciously assisted with the histological processing and lesion reconstructions. We thank Timothy Micah Burns and Vincent Gino Coppola for their help with the statistical analyses and the formatting of the manuscript. Anna Gagliardo as referee provided numerous helpful comments leading to an improved manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant IOS-0922508 to V.P. Bingman and C.V. Mora and written while V.P. Bingman was funded by NSF grant IOS-1457304.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation USA [IOS-0922508 and IOS-1457304].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 182.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.