1,916
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Major Articles

Obstacles to food security, food pantry use, and educational success among university students: a mixed methods approach

, PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , EdD, , PhD & , BA(’21)
Pages 2548-2559 | Received 10 Oct 2019, Accepted 22 Dec 2020, Published online: 12 Feb 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose. This study contrasts views of university students with very low or high food security scores with respect to: obstacles to healthy eating, food pantry use, and managing dietary and educational needs. Method. Comments on open-ended survey questions (n = 1374) were counted, compared, and thematically analyzed to discern differences between the two student groups. Results. Cost concerns were paramount among students with very low food security scores. Students with very low food security experienced significant challenges in reconciling dietary needs and long-term educational goals; this was not problematic among students with high food security. Students from both very low and high food security groups mostly expressed an openness to the campus food pantry, though stigma associated with its use remained a deterrent. Conclusion. While all students face similar challenges to healthy eating, food security status substantially shapes dietary health and the management of dietary and educational needs.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported through internal funds provided by Rowan University and the Department of Health and Exercise Science. The authors wish to thank June Ragone in the Office of Information Technology, and Rbrey Singleton from Student Government for supporting the promotion and delivery of this survey. Kevin Rescigno, a Nutrition and Dietetics student, supported various aspects of the project.

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of the United States of America and received approval from the Institutional Review Board of Rowan University.

Funding

No funding was used to support this research and/or the preparation of the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 141.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.