290
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Major Article

College students’ motivations for using fitness related technology

, PhD, RNORCID Icon, , PhD, MPH, RN, CPNP-PC, , PhD, RN & , PhD, RN, FNP-BC, PPCNP-BC, FSAHM, FAAN
Pages 1224-1232 | Received 15 Oct 2021, Accepted 25 Apr 2022, Published online: 16 May 2022
 

Abstract

Objective: The purpose was to understand college students’ motivations for the use and discontinued use of fitness related technology (FRT) in relation to their physical activity behaviors. Participants: Participants were undergraduate students (n = 22) who were eligible if they were between 18–24 years of age (emerging adulthood) and current or previous users of FRT. Methods: Qualitative descriptive design was used with semi-structured interviews conducted virtually. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Participants discussed four themes; (1) Motivations for physical activity, (2) Motivations for using FRT, (3) Social connection improves accountability for physical activity, and (4) The ups and downs of FRT goal setting and data display. Conclusions: Best practice guidelines need to be established for the use of FRT along with approaches to promote physical activity among this population. Additional research is needed to identify reasons for discontinuation of use and to develop potential interventions to promote sustained engagement with FRT.

Acknowledgments

The first author carried out this research study in partial fulfillment of the requirements for their Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing. We acknowledge the two pilot participants for their helpful feedback on the interview guide and the students who participated in this study.

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of the United States of America and received approval from the Northeastern University Institutional Review Board.

Ethical standard statement

The research study discussed in this paper met the ethical guidelines as set out by the IRB of Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

This work was supported by the Graduate Dissertation Research Grant from Northeastern University.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 141.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.