143
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Major Articles

Peer public health ambassadors and COVID-19 mitigating behaviors at a public university

, MPH, PhD, , MPH, , MPH, , MPH & , MPH, PhD
Pages 1828-1833 | Received 20 Sep 2021, Accepted 19 Jun 2022, Published online: 14 Jul 2022
 

Abstract

Objective

To examine how public health policy was reinforced by peer workers who were called Public Health Ambassadors (PHAs) at a West Coast university during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Descriptions of PHA community interactions were collected. Analyses were conducted using data from the 12-weeks of the 2020 Fall Quarter.

Results

In total, there were 5,112 interactions of which there were three types: (1) educational (4%), (2) noncompliance (90%), and (3) thanking (6%). About 1.3% of interactions were met with resistance.

Conclusions

Overall, compliance with campus public health guidance was high. Trends suggest compliance fatigue may have occurred after the first four weeks as evidenced by increased noncompliance rates and test positivity rates.

Policy Implications

These results suggest the feasibility of the implementing US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations of using trusted messengers to reinforce critical behaviors to support community health.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the excellent assistance of the program’s data team: Roshni Desai, Paola Daniela Diaz, Connor Ronald Jow, Kristie Ellie Tjen, Farha Shaygan, Traci Shiu, Estelle Yoo, Sharon Vien, and Renee Meade. The authors would also like to thank the Public Health Ambassador supervisor team and the students who served as Public Health Ambassadors to help the campus safely through the pandemic.

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of United States of America. The research was deemed not to require review by the Institutional Review Board.

Funding

No funding was used to support this research and/or the preparation of the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 141.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.