Abstract
How do we maintain our psychoanalytic footing during a frightening crisis that affects us all? How do we work effectively within a medium that most of us have not been trained for, might have little prior experience with, and that some worry is not effective? Even more daunting, how do we manage these two monumental challenges simultaneously? This paper will consider these predicaments and explore the conditions that promote useful psychoanalytic work while meeting on the phone or through videoconferencing amid a pandemic. It will include clinical material that illustrates a patient’s negative response to switching to teleanalysis and his reactions to the global pandemic, the analyst’s countertransference, and how considering their meanings allowed for the analytic work to continue and deepen.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Joshua Ehrlich for his copy-editing assistance.
Notes
2 To make the reading of this paper less arduous, I will be referring to both telephone sessions and online videoconferencing as teleanalysis.
3 For an extensive discussion of controversies, see Ehrlich (Citation2019).
4 As one example of this, when I presented process notes to experienced analysts in my study group, they could not tell the difference between the tele- and the in-office sessions unless the patient spoke explicitly about the frame.
5 Other analysts who also attest to the usefulness of teleanalytic treatment include Robertiello (Citation1972), Lindon (Citation1988), Zalusky (Citation1998), Leffert (Citation2003), Bassen (Citation2007), Hanly (Citation2007), Scharff (Citation2010, Citation2012, Citation2013a, Citation2013b, Citation2018), Eckardt (Citation2011), Mirkin (Citation2011), Migone (Citation2013), Essig (Citation2015), Lemma (Citation2015), Abbasi (Citation2016), Merchant (Citation2016), Wooldridge (Citation2017), and Marzi (Citation2018).
6 Our capacity to create an external setting conducive to good-enough psychoanalytic functioning rests on a good-enough internal setting. However, creating a good-enough external setting in turn supports our internal setting and therefore our psychoanalytic functioning. The internal and external settings form a feedback loop that can contribute either positively or negatively to our analytic efforts (Bridge, Citation2013; Parsons, Citation2006).
7 Looking back, I also understand it in part as a sign of anxiety about whether I could maintain my inner analytic setting in my new location.
8 I have myself experienced and hear others reporting that they having been feeling very tired since practicing telenanalytically full time. Although this feeling is multiply determined, I believe it stems in part from starting anew with all our cases at once and dealing with the cumulative intensity of all these beginnings and their accompanying affect storms amid a pandemic. I discuss other determinants later in this paper.
9 Interruptions and vacations in the analysis evoke similarly painful feelings and memories related to separations and losses.
Ehrlich, L.T. (2019). Tele-analysis: Slippery slope or rich opportunity? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 67, 249–279. Robertiello, R.C. (1972). Telephone sessions. Psychoanalytic Review, 59, 633–634. Lindon, J.A. (1988). Psychoanalysis by telephone. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 52, 521–528. Zalusky, S. (1998). Telephone analysis: Out of sight, but not out of mind. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 46, 1221–1242. Leffert, M. (2003). Analysis and psychotherapy by telephone: Twenty years of clinical experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51, 101–130. Bassen, C.R. (2007). Telephone analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 1033–1041. Hanly, C. (2007). Case material from a telephone analysis. In J.S. Scharff (Ed.), Psychoanalysis online 2: Impact of technology on development, training, and therapy (pp. 133–137). London: Karnac, 2015. Scharff, J.S. (2010). Telephone analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 91, 989–992. Scharff, J.S. (2012). Clinical issues in analyses over the telephone and the Internet. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 93, 81–95. Scharff, J.S. (2013a). Psychoanalysis online: Mental health, teletherapy, and training. London: Karnac. Scharff, J.S. (2013b). Technology-assisted psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 61, 491–509. Scharff, J.S. (2018). Tele-analysis beyond Skype. In. J.S. Scharff (Ed.), Psychoanalysis online 3: The teleanalytic setting (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge. Eckardt, M.H. (2011). The use of the telephone to extend our therapeutic availability. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis & Dynamic Psychiatry, 39, 151–153. Mirkin, M. (2011). Telephone analysis: Compromised treatment or an interesting opportunity? Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 80, 643–670. Migone, P. (2013). Psychoanalysis on the Internet: A discussion of its theoretical implications for both online and offline therapeutic technique. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30, 281–299. Essig, T. (2015). The gains and losses of screen relations: A clinical approach to simulation entrapment and simulation avoidance in a case of excessive Internet pornography use. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 51, 680–703. Lemma, A. (2015). Psychoanalysis in times of technoculture: Some reflections on the fate of the body in virtual space. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96, 569–582. Abbasi, A. (2016). Beyond the miles, memories, and usual modes of functioning: How we change as we help our patients change. Clinical plenary address, American Psychoanalytic Association, June 18, Chicago, USA. Merchant, J. (2016). The use of Skype in analysis and training: A research and literature review. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 61, 309–328. Wooldridge, T. (2017). Now I see you, now I don’t: Screen services, short stature, and the fear of being seen. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 14, 193–205. Marzi, A. (2018). The analyst’s identity and the digital world: A new frontier in psychoanalysis. Italian Psychoanalytic Annual, 12, 99–113. Bridge, M. (2013). Moving out – Disruption and repair to the internal setting. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 29, 481–493. Parsons, M. (2006). The analyst’s countertransference to the psychoanalytic process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 1183–1198. Additional information
Notes on contributors
Lena Theodorou Ehrlich
Lena Theodorou Ehrlich is a training and supervising analyst of the Michigan Psychoanalytic Institute, and a clinical supervisor in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, USA.