ABSTRACT
Background
Neutrophilic asthma (NA) may result in irreversible airflow limitations. Soluble advanced glycosylation receptor (sRAGE) has been shown to be associated with neutrophilic airway inflammation. However, the association between sRAGE and mucus hypersecretion in NA remains unknown. This study aims to assess the function of sRAGE on mucus hypersecretion.
Methods
A NA mouse model was established and treated with adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9)-sRAGE and inhibitors. Collagen deposition and goblet cell hyperplasia in the lungs were evaluated by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and Masson staining. sRAGE and mucin levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were measured by ELISA. Pathway molecule expression levels were determined by RT-qPCR and western blotting.
Results
The results showed that the NA mouse model exhibited airway mucus hypersecretion. Mice can be effectively transfected by AAV9-sRAGE via tail-vein injection and intranasal drip. AAV9-sRAGE increased the sRAGE levels but it inhibited the collagen deposition, the PAS score, as well as the expression of MUC5AC and MUC5B. Inhibitors of high-mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1), receptor for advanced glycation end product (RAGE) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) suppressed the MUC5AC levels in NA mice as well as in cultured HMGB1-induced human bronchial epithelial cells. Furthermore, the phospho- extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) protein in NA was increased while the sRAGE intervention inhibited this elevation.
Conclusions
These results suggest that sRAGE may be a potential target for the treatment of mucus hypersecretion in NA.
Availability of data and material
Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval
All animal experiments were approved by The Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University [2019 (KY-E-035)].
Consent for publication
All the authors approved the publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Author contribution
X.Z. performed and analyzed the experiments, conceived and wrote the manuscript; J.X., H.S and Q. W conducted the cell and animal studies; G.N. designed and supervised the study, as well as critically revised the manuscript and had the primary responsibility for writing. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.