A Genealogy of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument: Considering the Future of Federal Public Lands

Abstract

In September 1996, President Clinton proclaimed the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument (GSENM) in southern Utah in order to protect its scientific and historic resources. In December 2017, President Trump reduced the size of the Monument by 46 percent and opened the excluded lands to motorized vehicles, energy and mineral development, and sale or other disposition. His action was immediately challenged by multiple lawsuits which will take years to settle in court. This article examines these events and the shifting management of U.S. public lands through the lens of governmentality. It traces the genealogy of GSENM as perceptions of public lands shifted from vacant, to possessing valuable natural resources, to national landscapes, to show how new forms of management and governmentality arose and were contested. Using these insights, it considers what current trends in public land management suggest about an emerging neoliberal governmentality and the future of public lands.

Keywords:

• Democracy
• genealogy
• Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument
• neoliberal governmentality
• re-territorialization
• public lands

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article builds on my dissertation, Public Land and American Democratic Imaginaries: A Case Study of Conflict over the Management of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, from the University of Washington.

Notes

1 The term ‘national landscapes’ is taken from the National Landscape Conservation System, created in 2000 to manage national monuments and other special management areas under BLM jurisdiction. The name has since been changed to National Conservation Lands.

2 This section is condensed from Brugger (2009, 2014).

3 They also had liberal aspirations to protect liberty and equality by preventing the emergence of ‘land barons.’