![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
This study examines the reliability, factor structure, convergent, and construct validities of the Mandarin Chinese version of the Reasons For Living Inventory (RFL) among Taiwanese psychiatric patients. Demographical characteristics of patients who hold these adaptive cognitions and differences on the level of endorsement between suicidal and non-suicidal individuals were also investigated. All adult patients that had visited the psychiatric ambulatory clinic or had been admitted to the psychiatric ward in a general hospital in Taiwan over a 3-month period were consecutively invited to complete an inventory that included background information, the Mandarin Chinese versions of the RFL, the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire–Revised (SBQ-R), and the Beck Hopeless Scale (BHS). Of the 254 respondents aged 19 to 65 years, 47.2% had suicidal ideations or attempts within the past year. The original six-factor structure of the American version was confirmed to be acceptable. The Cronbach α was 0.964.Total scores on RFL were inversely and significantly correlated with that from BHS. Multivariate analysis with demographic data and items from SBQ-R revealed that higher scores on the RFL have been associated with married, have children or religious beliefs, fewer past and current suicidal ideations and attempts, fewer histories of suicidal threats, and a less self-reported likelihood of future suicide in our sample. The Mandarin version of the RFL inventory showed acceptable psychometric properties and could distinguish suicidal patients from non-suicidal ones.