Abstract
The FORTIFIED Home Program is a voluntary construction and re-roofing program designed to strengthen residential properties to withstand damages from severe weather events. The FORTIFIED designation framework can accommodate sustainable new home construction and existing property retrofitting efforts. Applying a two-state utility framework to Zillow’s ZTRAX and IBHS’s FORTIFIED designation data, we estimate the effect of a FORTIFIED Home designation on residential property values using sales transactions for coastal Alabama from 2011 to 2021. We add to the growing body of literature examining the relationship between eco-friendly construction applications and home prices by deriving the contribution of a FORTIFIED designation to enhanced risk reduction and lowered insurance costs. The results of our full- and nearest-neighbor-matched sample design suggest a likely price premium significance on the order of 2-4% for FORTIFIED homes.
Authors’ Note
Data provided by Zillow through the Zillow Transaction and Assessment Dataset (ZTRAX). More information on accessing the data can be found at http://www.zillow.com/ztrax. The results and opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect the position of Zillow Group
Correction Statement
This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
Notes
2 We use Zillow’s ZTRAX dataset, a nationwide dataset of property transactions available to researchers at no cost. Note, however, that Zillow recently announced plans to discontinue the ZTRAX program, effective September 30, 2023.
3 For example, among others, see Affuso et al., Citation2018; Bao & Wan, Citation2007; Dahal et al., Citation2019; Farmer & Lipscomb, 2010; Lipscomb, Citation2004; Peterson & Flanagan, Citation2009; Osland, Citation2010; Sirmans et al., Citation2005; Shultz, Citation2018; Shultz & Schmitz, Citation2009; Wolverton & Senteza, Citation2000; and, Wyman & Worzala, 2016.
Done, J. M., Simmons, K. M., & Czajkowski, J. (2018). Relationship between residential losses and hurricane winds: role of the Florida building code. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 4(1, March), 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000947 Burrus, R. T., Jr., Dumas, C. F., & Graham, J. E. Jr. (2002). Catastrophic risk, homeowner response, and wealth-maximizing wind damage mitigation. Financial Services Review, 11, 327–340. Carson, J. M., McCullough, K. A., & Pooser, D. M. (2013). Deciding whether to invest in mitigation measures: Evidence from Florida. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2012.01484.x Dehring, C. A., & Halek, M. (2013). Coastal building codes and hurricane damage. Land Economics, 89(4), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.89.4.597 Kleindorfer, P. R., & Kunreuther, H. (1999). The complementary roles of mitigation and insurance in managing catastrophic risks. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00442.x Jasour, Z. Y., Davidson, R. A., Trainor, J. E., Kruse, J. L., & Nozick, L. K. (2018). Homeowner decisions to retrofit to reduce hurricane-induced wind and flood damage. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 24(4), 04018026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000452 Peacock, W. G. (2003). Hurricane mitigation status and factors influencing mitigation status among ’Florida’s single-family homeowners. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(149) Petrolia, D. R., Hwang, J., Landry, C. E., & Coble, K. H. (2015). Wind insurance and mitigation in the coastal zone. Land Economics, 91(2), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.91.2.272 Affuso, E., Cummings, J. R., & Le, H. (2018). Wireless towers and home values: An alternative valuation approach using a hedonic spatial error model. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 56(4), 653–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-017-9600-9 Bao, H., & Wan, A. (2007). Improved estimators of hedonic housing price models. Journal of Real Estate Research, 29(3), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2007.12091199 Dahal, R. P., Petrolia, D. R., Grala, R. K., Gordon, J. S., Munn, I. A., & Cummings, J. R. (2019). A hedonic pricing method to estimate value of waterfront in the Gulf of Mexico. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.004 Lipscomb, C. (2004). An alternative spatial hedonic estimation approach. Journal of Housing Research, 15(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2004.12091971 Peterson, S., & Flanagan, A. (2009). Neural network hedonic pricing models in mass real estate appraisal. Journal of Real Estate Research, 31(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2009.12091245 Osland, L. (2010). An application of spatial econometrics in relation to hedonic house price modeling. Journal of Real Estate Research, 32(3), 289–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2010.12091282 Sirmans, G. S. D. A., Macpherson, E. N. & Zietz, (2005). The composition of hedonic pricing models. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2005.12090154 Shultz, S. (2018). Housing depreciation revisited: Hedonic price modeling versus assessor estimates. Journal of Housing Research, 27(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2018.12092140 Shultz, S., & Schmitz, N. (2009). Augmenting housing sales data to improve hedonic estimates of golf course frontage. Journal of Real Estate Research, 31(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2009.12091235 Wolverton, M., & Senteza, J. (2000). Hedonic estimates of regional constant quality house prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 19(3), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2000.12091020 MacDonald, D. N., Murdoch, J. C., & White, H. L. (1987). Uncertain hazard, insurance, and consumer choice: Evidence from housing markets. Land Economics, 63(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146293 Awondo, S., Hollans, H., Powell, L., & Chip, W. (2019). Estimating effects of wind loss mitigation on home value [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Alabama. MacDonald, D. N., Murdoch, J. C., & White, H. L. (1987). Uncertain hazard, insurance, and consumer choice: Evidence from housing markets. Land Economics, 63(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146293 Additional information
Funding
We thank the staff at the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety for providing access to the FORTIFIED dataset and Lars Powell for his assistance in obtaining it. We also thank the staff at Smart Home America and the Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium for their assistance throughout this study. This publication was supported by the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under NOAA Award NA18OAR4170080 and the Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium. This work was also supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station via Multistate Project W-4133 “Costs and Benefits of Natural Resources on Public and Private Lands: Management, Economic Valuation, and Integrated Decision-Making” (Hatch Project MIS-033140). The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of any of these organizations.