180
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reciprocal roles of joint position error, visual dependency and subjective perception in cervicogenic dizziness

, , , , &
Pages 262-270 | Received 09 Jun 2020, Accepted 27 Jul 2020, Published online: 10 Aug 2020
 

Abstract

Aim

Since cervical joint position error (JPE) and visual dependency (VD) may reflect altered ascending inputs from the neck receptors, the aim of the present study was to test how these parameters may be impacted by those clinical parameters in cervicogenic dizziness (CGD) patients when compared with healthy subjects participants.

Materials and methods

93 subjects participants fulfilling inclusion criteria for CGD and 98 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects volunteers – undergoing cervical relocation and rod and disc test to evaluate JPE and VD, respectively – were compared to each other. Cervical range of motion (CROM), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck pain intensity (NPI), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-17) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were also collected in both groups

Results

When compared to healthy participants, CGD patients were found to have a higher degree of JPE in right (p = 0.008, mean difference, MD: 2.88) and left (p = 0.006, MD: 2.55) rotation as well as in extension (p = 0.011, MD: 2.31), flexion (p = 0.009, MD: 2.35) and mean value (p = 0.001, MD: 2.53) and higher degrees of error in CCW at +40° and −40° (p = 0.012, MD: 0.85 and p = 0.016, MD: 0.82, respectively) and CW at +40° and −40° (p = 0.018, MD: 0.83 and p = 0.015 MD: 0.81, respectively). CGD patients also demonstrated a significant reduction in degrees of CROM in active flexion (p = 0.011, MD: −34.63), extension (p = 0.018, MD: −21.67), left (p = 0.012, MD: −28.29) and right (p = 0.009, MD: −28.52) rotation, and left (p = 0.02, MD: −7.29) and right (p = 0.021, MD: −5.05) lateral flexion. Furthermore, these patients demonstrated higher scores in total DHI (p = 0.007, MD: 25.17) (and relative DHI-P, DHI-F, DHI-E; p = 0.009, MD: 11.4; p = 0.014, MD: 8.73 and p = 0.018, MD: 5.03, respectively), in TSK-17 (p = 0.017, MD: 17.56), and HADS, both in anxiety (p = 0.022, MD: 4.62) and depression (p = 0.02, MD: 7.31) subscale.

Conclusions

A possible common physiopathological background may impact on processes involved in both the JPE and VD behaviour, entangled in a vicious circle with the impaired subjective clinical and quality of life perception.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Alessandro Micarelli, Pasquale Carlino and Riccardo Xavier Micarelli were funded by the ‘UNITER ONLUS Project’ for rehabilitation research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 711.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.