664
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Situational judgment test for measuring military tactical decision-making skills

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 462-473 | Received 15 Jan 2019, Accepted 03 Sep 2019, Published online: 17 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Situational Judgment Tests (SJT) have been used in assessing different constructs in many contexts, but there is no known SJT designed specifically for the military tactical level battle context. In this context, it is especially important that officers are able to act quickly even when experiencing stress and huge workload or confronted by unanticipated circumstances. Therefore, this study focuses on developing and testing an SJT for measuring military decision-making skills. The test was developed based on light infantry platoon-level tactical scenarios, where the potentially correct and incorrect test item options were created and evaluated by experts. Later, the test was validated empirically by collecting data from 80 conscripts and 134 cadets of the Estonian Defense Forces. IRT analysis was used to adapt the scoring key to empirical findings and to describe the quality of the test and its items. The empirical findings enabled us to specify the scores for different test item options. The follow-up analysis showed the test to have good reliability, difficulty level and discrimination of respondents. Also, test scores were found to be statistically significantly different for respondents with different levels of military experience and education, namely cadets and conscripts. The Mann-Whitney U test showed differences in the total test score and in making judgments in the initial and continuous problem situations. In conclusion, we found that the test can be used for assessing military decision-making in the infantry platoon-level battle situation context.

Acknowledgments

This research project is partly funded by the Estonian Ministry of Defense and carried out in cooperation between the Estonian Defense Forces, Estonian National Defense College, and the University of Tartu.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 584.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.