267
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Risk Factors for Legal Blindness in 77 Japanese Patients with Endogenous Endophthalmitis: A Multicenter Cohort Study from J-CREST

, MD, , MD, PhDORCID Icon, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhDORCID Icon, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD & , MD, PhD show all
Pages 1505-1512 | Received 15 Mar 2022, Accepted 14 Jul 2022, Published online: 25 Aug 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

We investigated potential predictive factors for visual prognosis in Japanese patients with endogenous endophthalmitis.

Design

Retrospective observational multicenter cohort study.

Methods

We examined the characteristics of 77 Japanese patients with endogenous endophthalmitis and performed statistical analyses of these real-world data. The primary endpoint was the identification of factors associated with visual prognosis. We examined differences between patients in the better vision and legal blindness groups at 12 weeks after treatment initiation.

Results

The five risk factors for visual impairment at 12 weeks after treatment initiation were presence of pressure injuries, severe clinical symptoms (presence of eye pain and ciliary injection), pathogen identification, and poor best-corrected visual acuity at baseline. Staphylococcus aureus and fungus were associated with a better visual impairment outcome.

Conclusions

Endogenous endophthalmitis remains a severe ocular infection; however, it can be managed with rapid treatments, as well as other advances in medical knowledge and technology.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ryan Chastain-Gross, Ph.D., from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or its supplementary materials.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2022.2112237

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 815.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.