366
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Real-World Visual and Neovascularisation Outcomes from anti-VEGF in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 70-76 | Received 31 Oct 2019, Accepted 30 Jun 2020, Published online: 12 Jul 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) can be complicated by macular oedema, requiring intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). CRVO can cause neovascularisation, potentially causing persistent pain if not identified early. Whilst clinical trial data describe visual and anti-neovascular benefit from anti-VEGF there are limited real-world data.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients found from a review of the electronic medical record at a single UK centre. Visual acuity, macula status, number of IVIs and neovascular status were extracted at standardised timepoints.

Results

In total, 231 eyes from 231 patients were identified with 6–48 months of follow up. Twenty-four months after treatment initiation, 81 eyes (53.3%) had no remaining macula oedema and mean visual acuity gained was 8.9 (SD 19.0) Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters following a mean of 10.1 (3.9) IVIs. Of 222 eyes that had no initial neovascularisation, 11 went on to develop it, with iris involvement in 10 eyes. Median time from treatment initiation to neovascularisation was 17.2 (range 5.0–44.1) months, and the median time from latest IVI to neovascularisation was 9.6 (2.9–27.6) months after a median of 4 (3–10) IVIs.

Conclusions

Visual acuity in CRVO complicated by macular oedema improves following anti-VEGF treatment but real-world gains are more modest than those from clinical trials. Neovascularisation following CRVO can be substantially delayed by anti-VEGF treatment and so if individuals who have received IVIs are to be effectively screened for neovascularisation long-term surveillance is necessary.

Declaration of interest statement

Threee of the authors have potential conflicts of interest to declare. HDJH: travel (Bayer), SJT: advisory board (Bayer, Novartis), travel (Bayer), research (Bayer, Novartis, and Roche), SDS: travel (Bayer).

Financial support

Conference travel grant HDJH and SDS from Bayer.

Submission statement

This manuscript has not been submitted elsewhere for publication.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 740.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.