476
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The epistemic dimension in the approach to questioning in chemistry classes: a comparative study of pedagogical practice in different social contexts

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2534-2554 | Received 10 Aug 2020, Accepted 23 Aug 2021, Published online: 19 Sep 2021
 

ABSTRACT

The study of questions has occupied a prominent role in the research into classroom discourse. For science teaching, questions are fundamental since they can connect students with the patterns of scientific thinking. In this article, we developed analytical tools to investigate the epistemic dimension of questions in chemistry teaching. We draw upon Basil Bernstein's concept of classification and the triadic relationship of the knowledge of chemistry to construct the instruments of analysis, and, through their application, we propose to study the distribution of knowledge through questions in classroom discourse. We validated our instruments in a case study of a chemistry teacher who taught in two Brazilian schools, and whose students came from different socioeconomic backgrounds. The results from the analysis indicated differences in the ways in which knowledge is imparted by the teacher in the two classrooms. In the lower socioeconomic context, the approach and posing of questions explored the symbolic form of knowledge more, whereas the approach in questioning to students from the upper socioeconomic context was more related to the theoretical knowledge base of chemistry. These findings suggest that students from lower social strata have access to a simplified chemistry, one that does not necessarily emphasise the theoretical explanations for the scientific phenomena. Considering that the scope of our study is limited to a single case, further research using the proposed analytical instruments in this article is required to confirm these findings.

Acknowledgements

To Professors Ana Maria Morais and Isabel Pestana Neves - ESSA Group - Sociological Studies of the Classroom, University of Lisbon.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Availability of data and material

The data collected and used in this research are the property of the authors and available for eventual consultations.

Additional information

Funding

This study was sponsored by CNPq Project 475414/2013-6, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico and by Fapesb Project PES 0043/2013, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (Fapesb).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 388.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.