212
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Majority Voting, Progressive Taxation, and Income Inequality

&
Pages 1124-1135 | Received 07 Nov 2020, Accepted 15 Oct 2021, Published online: 09 Nov 2021
 

ABSTRACT

A challenge for the political economy literature is why the average tax rate becomes less progressive while wage inequality increases with the skill premium. This paper contributes to the literature by developing a majority voting equilibrium model in which households choose their most preferred tax schedule under increasing inequality. We find that majority voting favors a marginal tax rate to fund transfers, where the average tax rate increases with income, when the median skill level lies below the mean skill level. The average tax rate becomes less progressive when required government revenue relative to mean skill increases. These findings reconcile the literature with recent empirical trends and are robust to relaxing the assumptions of exogenous government spending and endogenous labor supply.

JEL CODES:

Acknowledgements

The helpful comments and suggestions of two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Correction Statement

This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Notes

1 In the United States, the top marginal tax rate on personal income was 70 per cent in 1979, declined to 28 per cent in 1988, increased to 39.6 per cent in 1993, fell to 35 per cent in 2003 and has been at 37 per cent as of 2018 (US Department of the Treasury Citation2021).

2 See Pressman (Citation2016) for an overview of symposium issue papers on Piketty (Citation2014) from a post-Keynesian perspective.

3 While the substitution of ‘leisure’ for paid work is conceivable for high skill households, an explanation for the left side of the skill distribution would consider the type of welfare system in place. Households may reduce disposable income by choosing to ‘stay at home’ and avoid work-related transport costs, child-care, and risk of infection for instance in the Covid-19 pandemic. The threshold above which households can choose to reduce paid work could be very high for households in countries without a developed welfare system.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 625.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.