ABSTRACT
Women with HIV have higher rates of psychiatric disorders than HIV-negative women, yet little is known about their postpartum mental health and associated service use. The purpose of this study was to characterize HIV-positive women’s use of ambulatory and acute mental health services in the first year postpartum, relative to HIV-negative women. Using health administrative data, we identified 861,365 women who had a live birth delivery from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2012 in Ontario, Canada, of whom 530 were identified to be HIV-positive. We described their use of mental health services, including outpatient mental health visits, psychiatric emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). HIV-positive women were more likely to access outpatient mental health services (31.5% vs. 21.0%, aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03–1.55), but more likely to remain engaged in psychiatrist services only (15.6% vs. 6.5%, aOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.41–3.72). They were also more likely to require a psychiatric ED visit or hospitalization (3.3% vs. 1.1%, aOR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.72–4.12). Our findings highlight the importance of considering postpartum mental health as part of comprehensive reproductive health care for women with HIV.
Acknowledgments
We thank Alex Kopp and Laura Holder, ICES analysts, for their input and support regarding data analysis. This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES or Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHI). However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of CIHI.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.