77
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Using linkography to understand the thinking differences of designers between engineering and art backgrounds in the early stages of the design process

, , &
Pages 996-1022 | Received 17 Jan 2023, Accepted 13 May 2024, Published online: 23 May 2024
 

Abstract

In China, industrial designers are usually educated with engineering background while product designers are educated with art background. Despite these educational differences, both of them are adept at tackling design-related issues. However, different educational backgrounds can affect the idea generation, especially in the early stages of the design progress. This study investigates the thinking processes of designers between engineering and art backgrounds in the early stages of the design process. Designers are encouraged to express ideas verbally or by sketching, and linkography was used to visually depict the designer’s thinking process. Subsequently, with the help of vertical transformation value and the chunk, the features in the thinking of the two types of designers are explored, including: 1) In most cases, the vertical transformation value of the product designer is higher than that of industrial designer, which indicates that product designer is better at the reflection in design. 2) The chunk patterns in the linkographs show that industrial designers prefer to decompose tasks into sub-tasks and solve them individually, while product design participants tend to solve problems as a whole from a global view. These findings can enlighten the future research directions for design education and design organizations in multidisciplinary backgrounds.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Graduate Education and Reform Project of China University of Mining and Technology under grant number 2023YJSJG015. We are grateful to their support.

Ethical approval

The protocol studies were conducted at China University of Mining and Technology, between 26th April 2022 and 4th July 2022.Since the experiment involved human subjects, the experiment was approved by the ethics committee of the university.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Graduate Education and Reform Project of China University of Mining and Technology under grant number [2023YJSJG015].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 438.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.