403
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Influence of inoculum selection on the utilisation of volatile fatty acid and glucose in sulfate reducing reactors

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 225-236 | Received 12 Feb 2020, Accepted 19 May 2020, Published online: 22 Jun 2020
 

ABSTRACT

The capacity of three inocula (sewer biofilm, mangrove and estuary sediment) to utilise typical fermentation products of municipal solid waste for biological sulfate reduction was investigated. Each inoculum was used in two reactors, one fed a mixture of volatile fatty acids and another fed glucose to provide a suite of fermentation products via naturally occurring fermentation. Following 228 days of reactor operation, reactors inoculated with mangrove and estuary sediments exhibited higher sulfate reducing efficiencies (80–88%) compared to the biofilm-inoculated reactors (32–49%). Minimal use of acetate and its accumulation in the biofilm-inoculated reactors pointed to the high abundance of incomplete-oxidising sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB), Desulfovibrio and Desulfobulbus (90–96% of the sulfate reducing population). Although Desulfovibrio was also prominent in reactors inoculated with mangrove and estuary sediments, Desulfobacter, a known acetoclastic sulfate reducer, emerged from trace levels in these sediment (0.01% abundance in the estuary sediments and below detection in the mangrove sediments) to comprise 14%–70% of the sulfate reducing population at the end of reactor operation.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and the Australian Research Council Discovery Grant [DP140104572]. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Beatrice Keller-Lehmann and Nathan Clayton for their helpful assistance with the chemical analyses and Adam Shypanski for providing the inoculum used in this study. The authors acknowledge the support of the Australian Centre for Ecogenomics at the University of Queensland for their DNA extraction and pyrosequencing services.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This project was supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and the Australian Research Council Discovery Grant [DP140104572].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 223.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.