364
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Influence of substrate/inoculum ratio, inoculum source and ammonia inhibition on anaerobic digestion of poultry waste

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1894-1907 | Received 22 Jul 2022, Accepted 06 Dec 2022, Published online: 28 Dec 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Poultry wastes are rich in organic matter, allowing their use as substrates for biogas production by anaerobic digestion (AD). The major difficulty in the anaerobic digestion of this protein-rich waste is ammonia inhibition. Different results of biochemical methane potential (BMP) were obtained after the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of different avian waste in batch mode. It was shown that using two different inoculum (Liger and Saint-Brieuc) sources and different substrate-to-inoculum (S/I) ratios does not have a significant effect on the biochemical methane potential of organic laying hen droppings (OLHD); an average of 0.272 Nm3 CH4·kg−1·VS was obtained with both inocula. Otherwise, it affects the hydrolysis constant KH, and it decreases when the substrate-to-inoculum ratio increases. Furthermore, Liger is the most suitable inoculum for our substrate because it shows stability during the process even with different organic loads. Comparing the biochemical methane potential of multiple avian wastes such as organic laying hen droppings and different slaughterhouse waste highlights the importance of slaughterhouse waste in the anaerobic digestion process because of the high methane yield observed especially with the viscera (0.779 Nm3 CH4·kg−1 VS, SD = 0.027 Nm3 CH4·kg−1 VS). Moreover, methane production was affected by increasing the ammonia concentrations; when [N-NH3] > 9.8 g·N-NH3·L−1, the biochemical methane potential decreases and the lag phase increases (λ > 30 days); a total inhibition of the process was observed when ammonia concentration is above 21.8 g·L−1.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or on request from the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Regional Council of Brittany 10.13039/501100004584 (France) [grant reference ARED-MEVIBIO].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 223.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.