Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 38, 2022 - Issue 13
178
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Report

Test–retest reliability and measurement error of the modified gait efficacy scale in individuals with stroke

, PT, Ph.D, , PT, PhD, , PT, PhD, , PT, M.Sc., , OT, PhD & , PT, PhD
Pages 2956-2961 | Received 17 Jun 2020, Accepted 05 Jun 2021, Published online: 23 Jul 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To investigate the test–retest reliability and measurement error of the Brazilian version of the modified Gait Efficacy scale (mGES-Brazil) in individuals who have had stroke.

Methods

The mGES-Brazil was applied on two occasions, five to seven days apart, in a research laboratory setting. Test–retest reliability and measurement error, which included the standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), and analysis of the limits of agreement by the Bland–Altman plots, were examined.

Results

Fifty individuals who have had stroke (18 men), with a mean age of 64 ± 11 years, were evaluated. All individual items showed good reliability (Intra-class Correlation Coefficient – ICC2,1 > 0.90). The ICC was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) and the Bland and Altman plots revealed no systematic changes in the mean test–retest scores. The SEM (SEM%) was 3 (5%), within the recommended values, while the SDC was 8 points.

Conclusion

The mGES-Brazil demonstrated to be reliable to be applied within clinical and research contexts for the assessment of changes in walking confidence of individuals who have had stroke. Changes in mGES scores ≥8 points reflect real changes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq – grant number 304434/2014-0); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG – PPM 00082-16); and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – (CAPES – code 001).

Disclosure statement

Nothing to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the CAPES [Code 001]; CNPq [304434/2014-0]; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais [PPM 00082-16].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.