ABSTRACT
Background
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a diverse group of chronic lung conditions which is often characterized by inspiratory muscle weakness (IMW). Despite the potential importance of inspiratory muscle dysfunction in ILD, the effect of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) added to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in ILD largely remains unknown.
Objective
The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate the benefits of IMT added to PR on inspiratory muscle strength and secondary objectives were to assess its effects on functional capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pulmonary function test (PFT) and dyspnea in ILD along with IMW.
Methods
Fifty-one participants were randomly allocated into two groups; PR + IMT (n = 26) or PR alone (n = 25). The primary outcome [maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax)] and secondary outcomes [6-min walk distance (6MWD), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), PFT and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC)] were evaluated before and after the 8-weeks intervention. Independent t-test or Mann Whitney-U test was applied for between-group comparisons while for within-group comparison Wilcoxon’s Sign Rank test or paired t test was performed.
Results
At the end of 8 weeks exercise intervention inspiratory muscle strength (PImax + 11.10 cm H2O, p< .001), functional capacity (6MWD, + 47.90 m, p= .001), HRQoL (SGRQ-total – 4 points, p= .038) and dyspnea (mMRC dyspnea scale, −1.27, p< .001) improved significantly in PR+IMT group alone.
Conclusion
Inclusion of IMT to PR may have superior benefits as compared to PR alone in ILD accompanied with IMW.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the contribution of the members of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Department, Metro Centre for Respiratory Diseases, Metro Hospitals and Heart Institute, Noida for their assistance to conduct this study. We would like to thank Dr M.K Agarwal, Professor and Head of the Respiratory Allergy and Applied Immunology Metro Centre for Respiratory Diseases for research advice. We would also like to thank all the participants in this study for their time and support.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).