1,535
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical Research

Orchestrating automation and sharing in DevOps teams: a revelatory case of job satisfaction factors, risk and work conditions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 474-499 | Received 01 Sep 2018, Accepted 10 Jun 2020, Published online: 14 Jul 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Agile can be seen as an accelerator to develop software, yet it suffers from bottlenecks between development and operations. DevOps can overcome bottlenecks between agile development teams and operations, notably by providing continuous integration, delivery and deployment, thus improving end-to-end processes between development and operations functions. However, literature on DevOps effects is scant. Using job design characteristics theory and Herzberg’s job satisfaction theory, this paper investigates perceptions of job (dis)satisfaction, risks and work conditions among 59 employees working within 12 agile and DevOps teams in the same firm. Findings show that DevOps provides greater job satisfaction than agile alone. However, this case study also unveiled an effect of risk amplification with DevOps, and the greater need to orchestrate automation and sharing, contingent on work conditions. We theorise that orchestration of interactions between automation and sharing and related risks must be managed to improve job satisfaction when agile teams transition to DevOps.

SPECIAL ISSUE EDITORS:

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the reviewers for their feedbacks and to the EJIS Guest Editors for their invaluable help. We also extend our sincere thanks to our two colleagues at Nantes University who engaged with us in this research programme on DevOps : Laetitia Pihel for her contribution to the interviews with senior managers. We also thank Barbara Lyonnet who participated to data collection and analysis related to interviews. We are also grateful to Brian Fitzgerald and to Ojelanki Ngwenyama for helpful discussions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 337.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.