267
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Test–retest reliability of heart-rate variability metrics in individuals with aphasia

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 646-661 | Received 15 Jun 2020, Accepted 28 Jan 2022, Published online: 18 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Individuals with aphasia may have impairments in cognition, higher incidences of depression, and a variety of post-stroke functional impairments. However, evaluating these issues is challenging since most assessments require some degree of linguistic processing and task instructions are often verbal. Heart rate variability has shown to be an objective marker for cognitive functioning in neurologically healthy individuals, depression and post-stroke depression, and post-stroke functional impairments. However, before the utility of heart rate variability is established in persons with aphasia, its test–retest reliability needs to be established. The purpose of this study was to assess test–retest reliability of heart rate variability metrics in persons with aphasia. Heart rate variability was recorded at rest while in a sitting position in twenty-one persons with aphasia at two time points. Heart rate variability metrics were mostly moderately reliable. The majority of participants had resting heart rate variability parasympathetic and sympathetic indexes similar to those of neurologically healthy individuals. Further research is needed to establish the test–retest reliability of heart rate variability metrics in different postures and breathing conditions in persons with aphasia.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Rosalind Hurwitz, MA, CCC-SLP, Laura Kinsey, MS, CCC-SLP, and Emily Braun, MS, CCC-SLP who assisted with data collection.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 However, further work is needed to validate the use of such devices in individuals with aphasia.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported under Grant H133E130019/90RES5013 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). SAA was funded by the Switzer Merit Research Fellowship #90SFGE0014 from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 375.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.