4,282
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

University student well-being in the United Kingdom: a scoping review of its conceptualisation and measurement

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 375-387 | Received 06 Aug 2020, Accepted 08 Jan 2021, Published online: 11 Feb 2021
 

Abstract

Background

Well-being is a multifaceted construct, and measuring well-being, both within particular groups and at a national level, is a priority for policy and practice. This national agenda on measuring well-being is mirrored in the Higher Education sector. This is the first conceptual review of how well-being is measured among university students in the UK.

Aims

The aims of the review were to identify (i) the definitions or conceptualisations of well-being guiding the selection of well-being indicators for research within this population and (ii) measures of well-being used in university students in the UK.

Methods

A scoping review method was used.

Results

Twenty-eight validated indicators used to measure well-being in UK students were identified. While many were direct measures of (primarily mental or psychological) well-being, indirect “proxy” indicators, including measures of mental health symptoms, were identified.

Conclusions

This review has highlighted that there are inconsistencies in defining and measuring university student well-being, and the measures that have been used in this population are focused on subjective experience. These findings are in line with reviews of well-being measures in the general population. Implications for further research are discussed.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the SMaRteN leadership team, Professor Miranda Wolpert (University College London and Wellcome Trust), and Nancy Hey and colleagues at What Works Wellbeing for advice and guidance on this review.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

As a conceptual scoping review, there is no data attached to this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a mental health network grant (SMaRteN) funded by UKRI, awarded to Dr Nicola Byrom & Dr Alyson Dodd [ES/S00324X/1].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 989.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.