425
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Reliability of one-repetition maximum performance in people with chronic heart failure

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1706-1710 | Received 16 Jun 2017, Accepted 16 Feb 2018, Published online: 24 Feb 2018
 

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the one-repetition maximum strength test in people with chronic heart failure.

Design: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability study.

Setting: A public tertiary hospital in northern metropolitan Melbourne.

Participants: Twenty-four participants (nine female, mean age 71.8 ± 13.1 years) with mild to moderate heart failure of any aetiology.

Methods: Lower limb strength was assessed by determining the maximum weight that could be lifted using a leg press. Intra-rater reliability was tested by one assessor on two separate occasions . Inter-rater reliability was tested by two assessors in random order.

Statistical analyses: Intra-class correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Bland and Altman analyses were also conducted, including calculation of mean differences between measures (¯d) and limits of agreement .

Results: Ten intra-rater and 21 inter-rater assessments were completed. Excellent intra-rater (intra-class correlation coefficient2,1 0.96) and inter-rater (intra-class correlation coefficient2,1 0.93) reliability was found. Intra-rater assessment showed less variability (mean difference 4.5 kg, limits of agreement −8.11 to 17.11 kg) than inter-rater agreement (mean difference −3.81 kg, limits of agreement −23.39 to 15.77 kg).

Conclusion: One-repetition maximum determined using a leg press is a reliable measure in people with heart failure. Given its smaller limits of agreement, intra-rater testing is recommended.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Using a leg press to determine a one-repetition maximum we were able to demonstrate excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability using an intra-class correlation coefficient.

  • The Bland and Altman levels of agreement were wide for inter-rater reliability and so we recommend using one assessor if measuring change in strength within an individual over time.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02223624.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.