931
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Physical activity measurement in people with spinal cord injury: comparison of accelerometry and self-report (the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury)

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 240-246 | Received 08 Feb 2018, Accepted 25 Jun 2018, Published online: 01 Oct 2018
 

Abstract

Purpose: To (1) evaluate the level of agreement between individually calibrated accelerometers and the self-reported Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury when assessing moderate-vigorous physical activity; and (2) qualitatively examine the different components of physical activity each measure assesses.

Materials/methods: Nineteen manual wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injury (19.0 ± 12.9 years post injury, C5-L2 injury level) wore a wrist and spoke accelerometer for one week then returned to the lab and completed the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury for their last 3 days of accelerometer wear.

Results: Bland-Altman plots revealed low levels of agreement between the two measures when measuring total (bias = −5.6 ± 70.41 min/d, 95% agreement limits = −143.6–132.4 min/d), wheeled (bias = −9.7 ± 30.2 min/d, 95% agreement limits = −69.0–49.5 min/d), and non-wheeled (bias =12.3 ± 53.8 min/d, 95% agreement limits = −93.1–117.6 min/d) moderate-vigorous physical activity. The accelerometer was beneficial for detecting intermittent or brief activities while the self-report measure was useful for measuring lifting activities (e.g., resistance training) and wheeling on inclined surfaces.

Conclusion: Total and wheeled moderate-vigorous physical activity measured by an accelerometer and a self-report measure showed low agreement at the individual level. Additional research is needed to examine whether physical activity may be best measured using accelerometers and a self-report measure concurrently.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Accurate physical activity measurement has important implications for understanding the relationship between physical activity and health outcomes.

  • Many limitations exist to accurately measuring physical activity in people with spinal cord injury.

  • The most commonly used measures of physical activity in spinal cord injury are accelerometers and the self-reported Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury.

  • Accelerometers and the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury show low levels of agreement, highlighting that there are differences in the specific physical activity patterns that each measure is able to capture.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Rick Hansen Institute and the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (2015-RHI-PEPA-998).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.